SALES / SUPPORT : +1-877-525-5646   |   Login


Modern logo for a Luxury Laundry in San Juan, PR

Luxdry (the name of the company)

Contest Holder bespokelifestylemanagement ?

Last Logged in : 208days10hrs ago

Concepts Submitted

553

Prize Money
400
Winner(s)

1

A Logo, Monogram, or Icon veildAll design entries are veiled from other designers till the end of the contest. Featured Featured Contest Expedite Expedite Contest
tick_gray

Live Project

tick_gray

Deciding

tick_blue

Project Finalized


Project: Modern logo for a Luxury Laundry ...
Industry: Cleaning Logo
Contest Launched: Nov 28, 2023
Selected: 1 winning design from 553 concepts
Winning Design by: RobbySC
Close Date: Dec 02, 2023


Modern logo for a Luxury Laundry in San Juan, PR - Cleaning


Awarded as a winner
Project Report    

Sort by:


#90

#88

#81

#80

#79

#48

#47

#46

#45

#44

#43

#42

#41

#40


Creative Brief


Modern logo for a Luxury Laundry in San Juan, PR

Luxdry (the name of the company)

No

LUXDRY Laundry suggests a high-end and luxurious laundry service. The combination of "Lux" and "Dry" implies a focus on providing upscale and premium dry cleaning or laundry solutions. The logo design could incorporate sleek, elegant elements to convey a sense of sophistication, reliability, and top-notch service. Consider using refined fonts, a color palette associated with luxury, and perhaps an icon that subtly represents cleanliness and precision. Ultimately, the logo should evoke a feeling of exclusivity and quality in the laundry services we offer.

Cleaning

Logo Type
Logo Type

Symbolic
Symbolic


Modern
Sophisticated
Professional

Light Blue

not sure

My favorite color is tiffany & co. So i will like that to be part of the logo. Maybe the font Luxdry

Related Contests


Logo for home cleaning service
$300
Prize Money
147
Concepts
Logo for pest control company
$199
Prize Money
90
Concepts
Logo for Cleaning and Maintenance Company
$320
Prize Money
97
Concepts
Logo for a Tile and Carpet Cleaning Service
$400
Prize Money
100
Concepts

Discussion


Comments