Logo for agricultural pesticide company

Comments

• March 23, 2011 8:59 AM
   SiteAdmin
   
  Draft #16 and its variation by box1508 is a winning design on a similar contest site, therefore have been taken down.
  
  0   0
  
• March 23, 2011 2:39 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  To all designers, Thank you very much for all the effort and hard work that you put into this project. I really appreciate it.
  
  0   0
  
• March 22, 2011 12:13 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @box1508: draft #88, #89, #92 and #93 definitely looked better now compared to your previous designs. I wonder why you make the middle leaf tilt so much to the left in the first place.
  
  0   0
  
• March 22, 2011 12:06 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @yokorama: I see that you got rid of the globe in draft #87, but now I think it looks weird. I think better try other ideas. @BDesign: I'm sorry, but draft #86 is simply not what I'm looking for. @karent: I think your draft #97 and #98 is not suitable for a pesticide company.
  
  0   0
  
• March 21, 2011 12:14 PM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @yokorama: draft #76 is not too bad actually, but I feel earth based logo is not suitable for my company. @KeysoftTechnologies: draft #77 is not what I had in mind, but I find this design quite interesting and nice. Definitely will be considering this one. However, I find #79 to be unsuitable. @teroristd: draft #80 and #81 is too simple and common. It reminds me of the romans. @1661Design: I find draft #82 is a bit strange looking. Not sure what the shape supposed to be.
  
  0   0
  
• March 21, 2011 3:49 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @sihem: draft #70, #72, #73 is too simple. #71 is quite common. #74 is quite unique, but I am not sure about it though. @FARnaw101: draft #75 is too cartoony and too cute
  
  0   0
  
• March 21, 2011 12:19 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @bhanu: In draft #47, can you center the word "CHEMICA" just like in #48. I think it will look better. Thanks
  
  0   0
  
• March 21, 2011 12:06 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @Dzynds: I find draft #45 and #67 are not too bad, but I think they are not suitable for my company. For #68 and #69, i think they are just ok.
  
  0   0
  
• March 19, 2011 4:25 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @Irenecreations: #61 and #62 looks better :)
  
  0   0
  
• March 19, 2011 3:02 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @box1508: draft #17 and #54 seems to have the better font. I would like to see whether it is better if you make the middle leaf straighter (but not completely straight) and make the middle stalk a little shorter. You can use the font type in draft #17, make "Uni Agro" in green and "CHEMICA" in blue. Lets put a space between "Uni" and "Agro", I am curious how it will look. @Irenecreations: in draft #49 , can you make the two wheat bigger? Perhaps it will look better. I think currently its a bit thin/small.
  
  0   0
  
• March 18, 2011 1:09 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  To all designers: I want to remind everybody that I am open to other ideas that you think is nice and suitable for my company. Something that is serious and not too cartoony. It does not have to be specifically leaf, plants, padi, wheat or other agriculture stuff. That is why one of the logo example I gave is Novartis, which have a non-agriculture theme. Thank you.
  
  0   0
  
• March 17, 2011 12:46 PM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @box1508: In draft #17, I like the design on the left down corner better, where the logo is on the left side of company name. I like the font type too. But I would like to see another variation with a slightly more serious font type for comparison. Thank you. @jtscreative: Draft #39 is too cute. Need a more serious design. I am not sure about the test tube though. @Irenecreations: Draft #42 is nice. But I think we need to get rid of the tiny glitter at the end of one of the wheat. Also I would like to remove the small leaf at the end of "CHEMICA". I would like to see the same changes applied on draft #43. I think the logo in draft #43 is too small in comparison to the company name. I think need to make the logo bigger.
  
  0   0
  
• March 17, 2011 10:36 AM
   Malindasampath
   
  I can you make to given this logo
  
  0   0
  
• March 17, 2011 8:31 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @Markus: I am sorry, but #31, #32, #34, #35, #36 simply not what I am looking for. Maybe you can recheck the logo examples that I gave.
  
  0   0
  
• March 17, 2011 8:23 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @irenecreations: #29 and #30 are not the right type of logo. The company name should not be part of the logo (non-logo type). #26, #27, #28 are too simple.
  
  0   0
  
• March 17, 2011 4:00 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @jtscreative: #24 and #25 is getting too crowded. Previous design is better :) What about designing completely new different logos rather than improving on the one that you submitted?
  
  0   0
  
• March 17, 2011 2:01 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @jtscreative: #20 and #21 is slightly better looking than #9. Perhaps you can submit a new different concept? In this contest, I have yet to see a design like Strutt and Parker: http://www.spfarms.co.uk @BDesign: I see where you going with #18, combining the chemical and plant element, but somehow I feel it's not suitable
  
  0   0
  
• March 16, 2011 10:08 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @TriEmblem: #10 is way too simple. @Markus: #11 is also too simple. The entries so far have been very simple in my opinion. Perhaps its because I mention "simple" in my creative brief. I guess I need a more complex one :) Apologies for the misunderstanding if thats the case.
  
  0   0
  
• March 16, 2011 3:15 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  Here is some logo examples. They are not exactly 100% what I want, but it should give some ideas. Strutt and Parker: http://www.spfarms.co.uk Agroseeder: http://www.agroseeder.com Novartis: http://www.novartis.com
  
  0   0
  
• March 16, 2011 2:47 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @jtscreative: draft #6 and #7 is not bad. I like #7 better. I would have rate #7 a 3 star actually, but both are not the right type of logo. I am looking for a logo where the company name is not part of the logo (non-logo type)
  
  0   0
  
• March 16, 2011 12:58 AM
   hdjohan
    Project Holder
  @Markus: draft #1 and #2 is too common, simple, general. Not what I have in mind. @zeeshanshams: draft #4 and #5 also too simple and not what I have in mind.
  
  0   0